1 2026Are Latin American Players actually Safer Today?
joy39p10063675 edited this page 2026-05-01 18:43:39 +00:00


The prospect of over guideline and too much interference is pressing gamers towards the black market, where there are no much safer gambling guardrails or player protection procedures in location.
n n n nThat was a clear conclusion from SBC Media u2019s most current webinar session, u2018Are Latin American Players Actually Safer Today? u2019 in which several market specialists came together to go over the state of play on gamer protection in the area. It featured:
n n n nLuiz Felipe Maia - Founding Partner, MAIA YOSHIYASU ADVOGADOS. n n n nSimon Westbury - Strategic Advisor, 1xBet. n n n nSimon Vincze - Head of Sustainable & Safer Gambling, Casino Guru. n n n nAlfredo Lazcano - Gaming Lawyer, Lazcano Samano. n n n n nIs too much guideline denting gamer defense? n n n nLatin America is at a crossroads when it comes to gambling regulation. A diverse area, it makes up offshore-grey markets, provincially managed markets and totally federal or national regulative structures.
n n n nBut there are some examples of policy being altered, with proposals in Brazil to ban sponsorship and proposals to raise taxes in both Brazil and Mexico causing issue among operators.
n n n nThe panel was consentaneous in supporting regulated markets and the growth of new markets across Latin America, however there are clear indication that excessive disturbance triggers more harm than good.
n n n nMaia shared his experience as a specialist in Brazil u2019s framework, noting: u201cIt's a curve. You come to the optimal point of protection but as soon as policy becomes excessive, the gamers become less safeguarded due to the fact that is harmed. u201d
n n n nVincze did acknowledge that over-regulation can be harmful for gamers, but pressed back on the notion that regulated markets are naturally unsafe environments.
n n n n u201cIt would be inappropriate to discuss guideline in a sense that they would not be much safer, since at least now they have an alternative which is offering an enough framework for security and it is oversighted by an authority. u201d
n n n nConfusion among Latin American players n n n nThe Webinar was hosted along with 1xBet, which commissioned SBC Media to produce the International Player Safety Index series. Part three of the series was published just recently concentrating on Latin America and the webinar sessions offered a platform to discuss some of its findings.
n n n nSimon Westbury, Strategic Advisor at 1xBet, spoke to SBC News recently extensive on the findings of the report, and he reviewed the lack of consistency throughout guideline in Latin America.
n n n nIt strengthens Westbury u2019s Three Cs theory: if a market has no clearness, consistency or communication, then a Huge C emerges - confusion.
n n n n u201cI think there's a space in consistency throughout Latin America, and we're not saying that there needs to be a one-size-fits-all approach to gamer defense because every gamer is different. But there needs to be player protection enshrined in every regulative environment. u201d he noted.
n n n nThe theory is borne out in practice, too. Vincze had actually assessed some research study he had undertaken, using Google search analysis in Brazil and Mexico to approximate channelisation rates in those markets.
n n n nFollowing his analysis over a 30 day period, Vincze mentioned that 74% of particular casino name keywords searches were for overseas sites in Brazil, while that rate is 56% in Mexico. For recommendation, the UK sits at around 20%, Sweden 21% and Spain 27%.
n n n nVincze noted: u201cI believe it's due to the fact that there is increasingly more exposure on the internet on social networks for brand names which are not licensed and which can promote themselves through influencers, through social networks, strong accounts, without real enforcement. u201d
n n n nWhere can things get better n n n nThe good news is that operators have a variety of tools at their disposal to assist players keep safe on website. KYC measures are the first port of call, but others like deposit limits, time limits and cooling off durations have likewise been cited as working for players worldwide.
n n n nYet the panel noted that these tools can really trigger more confusion than good, if not used correctly.
n n n nLuzcano said: "Safer betting tools can be hard to utilize and operators do not know how to properly explain how to utilize them to the gamers. In the worst case situation, these tools might be simply neglected by players. u201d
n n n nMaia pointed out another Brazilian example, where a self-exclusion list has actually been introduced nationally. But since of an absence of understanding of the function, it has actually led to scams versus operators instead of assisting players.
n n n nHe said: u201cWe do not see the regulator and the federal government supporting the managed market. We had individuals with social benefits prohibited from playing, then we had dangers to increase tax in Brazil. What I think is the message that this depicts and the outcome is that we have the Brazilian authorities driving the gamers to the illegal market. u201d
n n n nWestbury noted that tools need to concentrate on education and making things enjoyable and appealing, rather than limiting and, in his words, scientific.
n n n n u201cI think in some cases we get it wrong as a market. A few of these tools are intrusive. Nobody likes to go to the doctor, no one likes to go to the dental expert due to the fact that of this clinical environment and it's not pleasurable, typically. I believe in fact, we require to be at the point of education.